Load Order of LassoStartup on CentOS

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
4 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Load Order of LassoStartup on CentOS

Justin Dennis-3
Lasso Team -

I'm finding that load order of files in LassoStartup is seemingly random on
CentOS compared to OS X.

Random is probably not the right way to describe it. It's consistent with
every startup, but the order seems to have been determined by something
other than alphabetical sort.

Anyone out there have experience with this? Thanks in advance.

- Justin

#############################################################

This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list Lasso [hidden email]
Official list archives available at http://www.lassotalk.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Load Order of LassoStartup on CentOS

jasonhuck
It's alphabetical, but it's also case sensitive, and may be sorting files
separately from folders rather than together...

- jason



On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Justin Dennis <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Lasso Team -
>
> I'm finding that load order of files in LassoStartup is seemingly random on
> CentOS compared to OS X.
>
> Random is probably not the right way to describe it. It's consistent with
> every startup, but the order seems to have been determined by something
> other than alphabetical sort.
>
> Anyone out there have experience with this? Thanks in advance.
>
> - Justin
>
> #############################################################
>
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>   the mailing list Lasso [hidden email]
> Official list archives available at http://www.lassotalk.com
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
> Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>
>

#############################################################

This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list Lasso [hidden email]
Official list archives available at http://www.lassotalk.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Load Order of LassoStartup on CentOS

Justin Dennis-3
Actually, it is definitely neither of these.

On Tuesday, October 11, 2016, Jason Huck <[hidden email]> wrote:

> It's alphabetical, but it's also case sensitive, and may be sorting files
> separately from folders rather than together...
>

#############################################################

This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list Lasso [hidden email]
Official list archives available at http://www.lassotalk.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|  
Report Content as Inappropriate

Re: Load Order of LassoStartup on CentOS

jasonhuck
Do you have some of the same files in more than one LassoStartup folder?
The main folder will load first, then each of the site folders in turn. If
you have duplicates across the main and site startup folders, it could
throw off the expected load order. If you load tags into the global
namespace, then duplicates across any of the startup folders (or those
defined in LassoLibraries or even in your site code) could also be a factor.

Otherwise, if you list the same set of files with file_listdirectory, do
you get the same results? Have you added logging to each of the files to
see what the load order actually is? Can you post it here? If you 'touch'
all the files in the directory so that they have the same modification
dates, does that change the load order?

- jason



On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Justin Dennis <[hidden email]> wrote:

> Actually, it is definitely neither of these.
>
> On Tuesday, October 11, 2016, Jason Huck <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> > It's alphabetical, but it's also case sensitive, and may be sorting files
> > separately from folders rather than together...
> >
>
> #############################################################
>
> This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
>   the mailing list Lasso [hidden email]
> Official list archives available at http://www.lassotalk.com
> To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
> Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>
>

#############################################################

This message is sent to you because you are subscribed to
  the mailing list Lasso [hidden email]
Official list archives available at http://www.lassotalk.com
To unsubscribe, E-mail to: <[hidden email]>
Send administrative queries to  <[hidden email]>
Loading...